Yes. That is an integral part of Project Aiur. In the drive to improve research quality we will focus, among other factors, on removing biases and incentivising greater reproducibility oversight as part of the peer review process.

We aim to subject reviews to the dual open scrutiny of the Knowledge Validation Engine and the rest of the community.

A peer reviewer who wishes to challenge the report from the Knowledge Validation Engine will need to stake tokens and follow a stepped process. Our goal is to create virtuous self-correction loops between Aiur as a system and individual community members, including authors and peer reviewers.